We tested and selected the Best Gaming Laptops for Call of Duty: Warzone in terms of Performance, Price, Display Quality and more.
Above you can see the Ranking with the results of the test and below you will find additional info about Call of Duty Warzone and the in-depth reports of each Gaming Laptop.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare has been a submachine gun rather than a howitzer since its release. There was a barrage of small patches, small improvements, small fixes – but now fat Bertha pops: The Warzone Battle Royale is currently hitting like no other game in spring. In just four days it reaches over 15 million players, thrills countless viewers on Twitch.
Sure, the developers were clever enough to release Warzone as a Free2Play variant that can run on its own. This trick already worked for Apex Legends. But the package becomes all the thicker if you own the original Modern Warfare.
Because now not only an immense multiplayer playground awaits you there, but also the sum of all previous improvements. We’ll show you what has changed since the release – and why Modern Warfare deserves an upgrade.
If you want to play the game without any issues you need a capable laptop that can run the game without any issues. That’s why we tested the most popular gaming laptops on the market to find the best laptop for Call of Duty: Warzone.
All Laptops are capable of playing Call of Duty: Warzone with high quality. But if you want a future-proof laptop that can runn future AAA game titles with high quality you definitely need our performance winner.
Call of Duty: Warzone – System requirements for your laptop
Call of Duty: Warzone – Minimum system requirements
- CPU: Intel Core i3-4340 or AMD FX-6300
- CPU SPEED: Info
- RAM: 8 GB
- OS: Windows 7 64-Bit (SP1) or Windows 10 64-Bit (1709 or later)
- VIDEO CARD: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 or AMD Radeon HD 7950
- PIXEL SHADER: 5.0
- VERTEX SHADER: 5.0
- SOUND CARD: Yes
- FREE DISK SPACE: 90 GB
- DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 2048 MB
Call of Duty: Warzone – Recommended system requirements
- CPU: Intel Core i5-2500K or AMD Ryzen R5 1600X Processor
- CPU SPEED: Info
- RAM: 12 GB
- OS: Windows 10 64 Bit (latest Service Pack)
- VIDEO CARD: Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 4GB / GTX 1660 6GB or AMD Radeon R9 390 / AMD RX 580
- PIXEL SHADER: 5.1
- VERTEX SHADER: 5.1
- SOUND CARD: Yes
- FREE DISK SPACE: 90 GB
- DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 4096 MB
Test Results: Best Laptops for Call of Duty: Warzone
Ranking First: Dell Alienware 17 R5
- QHD display with 120 Hz available
- Very many configuration possibilities
- Nifty SSD
- Great gaming performance
- Size and weight
- Battery life
After Schenker’s XMG models, Dell also equips the notebooks of the Alienware brand with Coffee Lake. The manufacturer even advertises the new gaming models 15 R4 and 17 R5 with up to 5.0 GHz clock rate in the large i9-8950HK. Additionally, an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 and UHD with G-Sync are available upon request.
Core i7-8750HK overclocked up to 4.1 GHz
For the processors, Alienware relies entirely on the new Coffee Lake generation from Intel. In the 15 inch model, the Core i5-8300H with four cores and 2.3 GHz base and 3.9 GHz turbo clock marks the entry, which also brings hyperthreading along like its big brother, the i7-8750H. The latter offers six cores, which clocks between 2.2 GHz and 3.9 GHz per turbo in Alienware. The i9-8950HK with six cores can also be selected as the top model.
According to Dell, this should be overclocked up to 5.0 GHz – how the cooling manages this in detail is not yet known. However, Dell had talked about adjustments in the area of the heatpipes and fans, as well as vapor chambers. In the larger model, 17 R5, the i7-8750H starts directly with the i9, which is also available for an extra charge.
Graphics cards are available from both AMD and Nvidia. The AMD Radeon RX 570 with 8 GByte GDDR5 marks the entry level. Nvidia’s GTX 1060 (6 GByte), 1070 and 1080 models are optionally available. The 1060 and 1070 are overclocked in the 15-inch model and even all Nvidia GPUs in the 17-inch model. Moreover, 8 GByte DDR4 RAM with 2.400 MHz is also available ex factory, optionally up to 32 GByte with 2.666 MHz can be configured.
As already in the previous revision, an SSD is not part of the standard repertoire, but a 1 TByte HDD. Various storage solutions are available in the form of HDD and SSD as well as combinations of both variants including an option with Intel Optane 120 GB. Also the batteries correspond on paper to their predecessors: 68 watt hours as standard, 99 watt hours optional.
From Full HD to UHD with and without G-Sync
Regardless of size, the screen offers a resolution of 1920 × 1080 pixels and a refresh rate of 60 Hz as standard. Five panels are optionally available for both sizes, three of them with G-Sync. For the 15.6-inch model, there is a choice of Full HD panels with 60 or 120 Hz or UHD with 60 Hz. All three versions are optionally available with G-Sync. The 60 Hz panels use IPS technology in both resolutions, the 120 Hz screens are TN-based. Instead of the fast Full HD model from the 15 R4, the 17 R5 has a counterpart with 2,560 × 1,440 pixels, the maximum is again a UHD screen.
In the large notebook, the higher resolutions are also equipped with Tobii Eye Tracking. The brightness in the 17 R5 should be at 300 (Full HD, UHD) and 400 (QHD) cd/m² respectively. Which is perfect for Call of Duty: Warzone, high graphics power means less lag, provided there is a good interent connection.
Proprietary connection for eGPUs remains
eGPUs also continue to be an issue for the manufacturer. The Graphics Amplifier is available again in the new revision, the concept is similar to that of the Razer Core v2. Unlike Razer, Alienware still relies on a proprietary connector for the eGPU, which is attached to the back of the notebook.
Bluetooth 5.0 and WLAN according to the ac standard, as well as Gigabit Ethernet are available for internet and wireless data, the network components come from Killer Networks. The notebooks are equipped with 3 × USB 3.0 ports, one of which is a type C port, 1 × Thunderbolt 3, 1 × graphics amplifier port, 1 × HDMI 2.0, 1 × Mini-DisplayPort 1.2, 1 × microphone and 1 × headphones.
Verdict: Alienware 17 R5 for Call of Duty: Warzone
The keyboard called TacX has been redesigned and now supports N-key rollover. The keys have a stroke of 2.2 millimeters and are therefore unique on the notebook market according to Dell. A steel plate under the keyboard provides balance and stability. The keyboard is guaranteed to withstand up to ten million keystrokes.
A new mechanism on the maintenance flap should also simplify access to the exchangeable components. This pro keyboard makes rounds the Alienware 17 R5 off for a great laptop for Call of Duty: Warzone. The Dell Alienware 17 R5 with its great performance, sleak design and equipment directed to gamer needs it wins the performance award for Call of Duty: Warzone.
Ranking Second: HP Omen 17t
- High processing speed and power
- Fast response display
- Best price-performance-ratio
- Beautiful design
- Fan a little bit noisy under load
HP Omen 17 for Call of Duty: Warzone?
Before the moment of truth struck in the test lab, HP’s new gaming notebook, Omen 17, first let its muscles flex: On the datasheet it impressed with top class components that probably every PC gamer dreams of. We reveal what the 1,799 Dollar expensive device can really do in the test.
HP Omen 17: A heavyweight
The HP Omen weighs a hefty 7.1 lbs. – without power supply. With it it is 1.2 lbs. more. With its 17.3-inch display (1920×1080 pixels), the angular heavyweight is wide and only limited suitable for travel. It is better used as a desktop replacement in your own four walls.
Under the “armor” of aluminum and plastic beats a powerful heart: The built-in Intel Six-Core i7-8750H and 32 gigabytes of RAM provided a lot of steam in the speed measurements. Office programs and video editing didn’t take it to the limit. But the fans turned up audibly with a measured 1.8 sone.
HP Omen 17: Loud warrior
Impressive: The HP Omen also marched through the game measurements without any visible jerking. In native resolution, the Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070 graphics card delivered an average of 150 frames per second (fps) – a dream value! On an externally connected 4K monitor it was still a good 53 fps.
The graphic fireworks were nice to watch, but with 5.1 sone unfortunately also clearly audible. The reason: HP’s “Warrior” really ran riot in games, heated up by 32 degrees compared to the ambient temperature. The fans therefore rotated in a rush.
The fully charged battery lasted a maximum of three hours in the test when simple work was pending. The value was reduced to only 2.5 hours in video rendering – that’s quite short. The only thing shorter is the time it takes for the battery to reach 100 percent. In the test this was the case after one hour and 40 minutes.
HP Omen 17: Beautiful screen
The display refreshes the screen a whopping 120 times per second (120 Hertz technology) – twice as fast as most notebook screens. The advantage became apparent in hectic gaming scenes: Thanks to the high frequency, the images supplied by the graphics card landed on the display so quickly that torn images didn’t stand a chance.
If desired, Nvidia’s G-Sync technology can be activated via the driver, which ensures that the image is updated as often per second as the graphics card provides images – all in real-time. The lab also determined a high color accuracy of 94.5 percent and perfect contrast. One disadvantage depending on the situation: the screen is reflective.
HP Omen 17: The “secret weapons”
Very few notebooks nowadays still offer a DVD burner, often there is a lack of space. The HP Omen 17 has more than enough of that, so there is also an optical drive in it.
Besides the SSD memory (1TB freely usable), a classic hard disk is integrated, which provides 2TB for movies, music & co. The usual wireless standards are on board in the latest version: WLAN-ac, Bluetooth 4.2.
The HP offers two USB 3.0 sockets, Thunderbolt (type C), HDMI, DisplayPort, network socket on the physical connections.
The keyboard with backlighting types pleasantly, but has a layout that takes getting used to, such as a bar-shaped, narrow enter key. Six practical macro keys are found on the side. The keyboard is great for a shooter like Call of Duty: Warzone.
HP’s Omen 17 passed the test course with flying colours to the delight of gamers. However, it lost some points and made a lot of heat and noise – this shouldn’t happen. But as the price is very fair for the power and equipment you get, the HP Omen 17 wins our “Best price-performance ratio” award for the best laptops for Call of Duty: Warzone.
Ranking Third: MSI GE75 Raider
- Extremely high performance
- Four speakers
- Still relatively compact for such powerful equipment
- Good maintainability
- Very hot and loud under load
- No G-Sync
- No Thunderbolt
MSI GE75 Raider 9SG test: Design and workmanship
The intended use of the MSI laptop is visually unmistakable. The red dragon logo on the back, the two same-colored accents next to it and the large fan slots are just a few elements that convey that this is a gaming notebook. And as it turns out a great one for Call of Duty: Warzone.
One surprise is the form factor: While other notebooks of this caliber look like a mini desktop with display and battery from the outside, the MSI GE75 9SG remains relatively compact. But this doesn’t apply to the included power supply, which weighs more than two pounds and is thus heavier than many ultrabooks.
The upper side and the top case are made of aluminum, while the rest of the case is made of plastic. Considering the hardware, this makes for a still acceptable weight of 5.75 lbs. The case also appears stable and is largely torsionally stiff. However, the impression of workmanship is diminished by the plastic underside, which takes some getting used to. A unibody metal case would be appropriate in this price range.
MSI GE75 Raider 9SG in review: Input devices and connections
Contrary to the current trend, you usually don’t have to do without many connections in gaming notebooks. This also applies to the MSI device. It offers two audio ports for microphones and headphones, Mini-DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, Ethernet, an SD slot and a conventional charging jack.
There are also two USB 3.1 ports, one USB 3.0 port and USB-C with 3.1 speed. Thunderbolt 3 was omitted despite the high price.
The keyboard with branding from Steelseries has individual RGB lighting for each key. This offers all kinds of lighting effects, which you can change at the touch of a button below the power key. You can also make your own changes and define macros and profiles for certain games in the corresponding software.
The brightness can also be adjusted in several steps. These settings can help in Call of Duty: Warzone if you get used to them.
MSI GE75 Raider 9SG: Display
MSI installs a 17.3 inch IPS display in the Raider. It resolves in Full-HD and offers a refresh rate of 144 Hertz. On the product page it says that there is also a configuration with a 240 hertz display, but we couldn’t find this at any dealer. Unfortunately, G-Sync isn’t on board, as the manufacturer has opted for Nvidia Optimus instead.
As expected, the contrasts are good and the color rendering also looks solid for a gaming notebook. According to MSI, the panel should cover the sRGB color space to about 100 percent. The display doesn’t become brighter than average, though.
MSI GE75 Raider 9SG: Features & Performance
An Intel Core i7-9750H serves as processor in the GE75 Raider 9SG. This offers six computing cores and twelve threads.
By the way, an optional Intel Core i9 is listed on the product page, but we couldn’t find this configuration at retailers. There are 16 gigabytes of DDR4 memory and two slots for PCIe SSDs as well as a connection for a 2.5 inch hard disk. In the cheaper variant, a PCIe SSD with 512 gigabytes and a 1-terabyte HDD is built in. The full configuration tested by us offers two PCIe SSDs with 1 terabyte of memory each in a RAID-0 array.
The read and write speeds are correspondingly fast, with a maximum of 3.53 and 3.38 gigabytes per second respectively. However, similar values would also be possible with a single PCIe SSD, for example the Samsung 970 Pro. The RAID-0 group does not bring you a noticeable advantage.
You can see what kind of performance the core components such as the processor, the graphics card and the main memory achieve with the following benchmark results in the table.
MSI GE75 Raider 9SG: Battery life, fans and multimedia
This laptop does support Nvidia Optimus, but the runtimes of the 65 watt hour battery are sobering. The device lasted exactly four hours in PCMark 10’s battery test “Modern Office” with 50% screen brightness and the energy saving setting “More battery efficiency”.
Not an exhilarating value. The mobile use for normal activities, such as surfing and writing emails, is therefore rather entertaining without a nearby power outlet. MSI could have confidently done without Optimus and instead provided G-Sync.
Verdict: Cheaper gaming fun at the highest level
The Raider from MSI is clearly only aimed at a small, paying target group of gamers and high performance enthusiasts. But they also get their money’s worth. It offers the fastest graphics performance that we have tested so far, which is great for Call of Duty: Warzone.
Unfortunately, it also gets pretty loud and hot and the battery life isn’t really good despite Optimus technology. Instead, we would have preferred support for G-Sync and Thunderbolt 3 support.
The Ultimate Call of Duty: Warzone Review
The PC version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare was really fun in our technology test in December 2019. With the new engine, the game flexed its optical muscles, especially in the campaign, without the need for a high-end computer.
And with raytracing from day one, there was also an optically successful highlight for owners of a GeForce RTX graphics card.
The new Battle Royale from Call of Duty is F2P
Now the game opens up much wider and offers a Battle Royale mode. Instead of the classic one for the full price of 60 Dollars, this part is available with a free-2-play model, i.e. free of charge – but with microtransactions.
The campaign and the multiplayer mode are still reserved for buyers of the full version. Warzone should become a competitor to Fortnite, Apex Legends or the paid PUBG.
This article will not focus on playful aspects of CoD: Warzone, but purely on the technology of the PC version including extensive graphics card benchmarks.
The graphics do not reach the main game
The campaign of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare looks very good to absolutely impressive. Even the multiplayer mode, on the other hand, drops off considerably and Warzone takes another visual step back. The reason – a higher performance and thus potentially more (satisfied) players – is obvious.
Blackout, the Battle-Royale-Mode of CoD: Black Ops 4, ran significantly slower than the rest of the game. With Warzone it’s different: Despite the high player numbers of 150 participants per game, the title performs well.
Because the level in the main game is very high, the new Battle-Royale-Map is by no means ugly even several levels below. In some areas the new engine still lets your muscles flex. On average, the graphics is at best average, though. The biggest weak point is the level of detail (details in the distance, LOD), which works incredibly aggressive in Warzone. From an estimated 30 feet (10 meter) away, there’s virtually no vegetation at all, but there’s a lot in front of the player. And this then pops up in front of him while running. That’s noticeable and annoying when playing.
The remaining cuts compared to the campaign are much less significant. So the vegetation is not only affected by the LOD, there are simply less. The textures are much more blurred, in some places they don’t seem to be loaded at all, as long as you are not standing close to the object. This did not happen consistently during the test, but every now and then – it is possible that this is still an error. The shadow cast is also much easier in CoD: Warzone. In combination with the great lighting even without raytracing it is one of the highlights of the campaign. Talking about raytracing: It’s an option in Warzone, but will not be considered further due to the high performance costs.
No changes apart from the graphics
Apart from the graphics quality, there have been no technical changes in Call of Duty: Warzone. The Battle Royale mode also runs exclusively on DirectX 12, but the game still works not only on Windows 10, but also on Windows 7, as Infinity Ward has implemented the low-level API for the old operating system separately. Also the good graphics options haven’t changed: There are the same options, possibilities and help texts. But this also means that there are still no graphic presets, so that each graphic option must be adjusted individually.
Test system, test sequence and settings
The following graphics card benchmarks have been performed on an Intel Core i9-9900K, which runs with the default settings and can access a total of 32 gigabytes of memory with a speed of DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-32). “Windows 10 April 2020 Update” including all currently available patches is installed. The Adrenalin 20.2.2 and the GeForce 442.59 were used as drivers. The Nvidia driver is officially optimized for Warzone, there is no corresponding counterpart from AMD.
The 25 second test sequence shows a run over the Battle-Royale-Map near the map section “Hills”. The scene takes place in the outer landscape and shows a high visibility and vegetation, numerous buildings and generally many objects. It is a demanding sequence, but not a worst case scenario. Comparable frame rates are achieved in several other areas on the map.
In 1,920 × 1,080 as well as in 2,560 × 1,440 the maximum graphic details are used, only ray tracing is deactivated. For 3,840 × 2,160 the graphic details are reduced. Since there are no presets, each option is set individually, only the textures and caching options are still at their maximum. If available, the detail level “Normal” is selected. If it does not exist, the option is reduced by one level. The anti-aliasing is set to SMAA 1X.
|1,920 x 1,080||Maximum details, no ray tracing, cinematic SMAA T2X|
|2,560 × 1,440||Maximum details, no ray tracing, cinematic SMAA T2X|
|3,840 x 2,160||Normal details, at least one level reduced, SMAA 1X, no ray tracing|
Benchmarks in Full HD, WQHD and Ultra HD
Call of Duty: Warzone behaves like the skin game Modern Warfare in terms of performance and thus shows some special features. But the generally very good frame rate has remained the same. Even the GeForce GTX 1060 manages an average of 60 FPS, GeForce RTX 2080 Super and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti achieve 144 fps with maximum graphic details. 60 FPS in the frametimes are given from GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce GTX 1660 Super. Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 5500 XT already achieve this with AMD.
Higher resolutions of course require faster graphics cards, but the Battle Royale mode also remains modest. 144 FPS doesn’t even manage a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti anymore, but 60 FPS is available from GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce RTX 2060, Radeon RX Vega 56 or Radeon RX 5600 XT. Even in Ultra HD several graphics cards reach this target. Starting with GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, GeForce RTX 2070 Super, Radeon RX Vega 64 and Radeon RX 5700, Warzone runs quite smoothly. However, the detail level had to be reduced for this.
Radeons and especially GCN like the Battle Royale
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare already ran better with graphics cards from AMD than with those from Nvidia, and the new Warzone mode doesn’t change that. For example, the Radeon RX 5700 XT with the RDNA architecture is only 3 percent behind the GeForce RTX 2070 Super in 2,560 × 1,440, and in 3,840 × 2,160 there is even a tie. Nvidia’s Turing model is 11 percent faster in the AAA game editing, on the other hand.
But the real winner is the old GCN generation. Thus, the Radeon RX Vega 64 is only 2 percent slower than the Radeon RX 5700, but usually the gap is 9 percent. Thus, the old Radeon is as fast as the GeForce RTX 2060 Super, which is clearly faster with a plus of 13 percent on average. Only the flagship Radeon VII doesn’t come out of the trenches in Warzone: The model is hardly faster than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and the Radeon RX 5700 XT, despite the massively higher raw power.
Even Turing is somewhat behind against RDNA and GCN, but Nvidia’s previous generation Pascal is really hit hard. Usually, the Radeon RX 580 is only slightly 5 percent faster than the GeForce GTX 1060, but in CoD: Warzone it’s a whopping 33 percent. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is otherwise rather as powerful as the GeForce GTX 1080, but in the free-2-play part of Call of Duty it is superior by 17 percent in FPS, and in frametimes it’s even 27 percent.
Turing clearly increases the frametimes in comparison to Pascal
The frametimes show, that Turing works better in warzone than Pascal. Thus, the GeForce RTX 2070 delivers “only” 39 percent more frames per second than the GeForce GTX 1080, but the plus in frametimes is a high 59 percent.
A GPU generation shows weaknesses in the frametimes
Generally Call of Duty: Warzone shows very good frametimes. Especially the GeForce RTX 2070 Super knows how to convince in this discipline, because the Turing accelerator has only very small fluctuations in the image output. The Radeon RX 5700 XT and Radeon RX Vega 64 also score well in this respect, but there is a larger deflection with both graphic cards. It’s not tragic because you can’t feel it when playing games, but it is reproducible. While Turing gets the best result, the predecessor Pascal gets the worst. The GeForce GTX 1080 has several mid-range outliers that run through the entire Pascal portfolio. This is no problem at high frame rates of more than 60 FPS. But if the FPS are lower, the small hooks can be felt.
CPU benchmarks show big differences
The good news: Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable even with a slow processor like the Core i3-8100 with only four cores and four threads. The frame rate remains over 60 FPS with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE, but the frame times fall below this value. So the gaming experience isn’t optimal. And it goes significantly better.
The other tested CPUs show that the free Battle Royale mode also reacts strongly to the CPU. Not every product is suitable for high frame rates. And so COD: Warzone is also much more CPU demanding than the classic multiplayer in Modern Warfare.
Anyone aiming for 144 FPS needs one of the fastest processors on the market. Even the Core i9-9900K, and thus the fastest tested CPU in the game, can’t consistently maintain 144 frames per second. However, the full frame rate is reached from time to time.
All Ryzen 3000 are comparably fast
The Core i7-8700K from the same manufacturer and AMD’s entire Ryzen 3000 squad based on Zen 2 do just as well. The second fastest processor is the Ryzen 9 3900X, which nevertheless has to admit defeat by 16 (FPS) and 13 percent (frame times) compared to the Core i9-9900K. Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600 and also Core i7-8700K are all on a comparable level. This also shows that Warzone can’t do anything with more than six CPU cores.
All other tested CPUs are also suitable for a good gaming experience with constantly over 60 FPS, but are no longer suitable for the 144 FPS target. The Core i7-7700K has to give in to the Core i7-8700K by 12 or 20 percent respectively. The Ryzen 5 2600X is 16 and 19 percent slower than the Ryzen 5 3600 with six cores, the Ryzen 5 1600X is 5 and 10 percent slower.
Infinity Ward has actually managed to make Call of Duty’s free playable Battle Royale mode Warzone achieve the same high frame rates as the classic multiplayer mode of Modern Warfare, despite the massively larger map and the significantly higher number of players. But the developers did not do magic. Instead, the graphics quality had to be visibly reduced. The presentation is still ok and has kept some highlights, but doesn’t come close to the classic multiplayer mode and even less to the very pretty campaign of the game.
Due to the high frame rate, CoD: Warzone doesn’t need a high-end graphics card for either Full HD or WQHD, and even in Ultra HD it doesn’t have to be a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti with reduced graphics details.
The editorial staff’s benchmarks show an almost consistently strikingly good performance of AMD’s old GCN generation. Whether Radeon RX 580 or Radeon RX Vega 64, the old Radeons are clearly superior to Nvidia’s Pascal generation. But also compared to the newer Turing and RDNA products, the old guard performs very well. Thus the F2P part of Call of Duty: Warzone behaves just like the paid main game Modern Warfare.